The unsettling thing about Praxis is that its founder was not a fool, and its curriculum was not nonsense. The man the school called the Architect had produced, over years, a body of teaching about the human psyche and the failure modes of civilization that people far outside his orbit concede is genuinely, disconcertingly good — maps of how attention is captured, how incentives corrupt, how a species races toward what he called the coming catastrophe. He spoke fluently of a "third attractor," a path between collapse and control. Students arrived to fix themselves and found, to their delight, that they were being handed the operating manual for the world.
The flaw was not in the maps. It was in the mapmaker, and it was the kind of flaw the maps could not see because they were drawn by it. The Architect had concluded, somewhere along the way, that the system could only be fixed by fixing the humans in it — and, being a man who by many accounts could model everyone's interior but feel his way into no one's, he pursued that fix without the brake that empathy would have supplied. Radical self-transcendence became the doctrine; the school's inner ranks became the laboratory; the transcendence demanded of the (mostly female) inner circle curdled, by degrees, into control — vows, collateral, a hierarchy of devotion, and coercion dressed as growth.
The people who study these collapses note the specific horror of this type: the brilliant systems-thinker who mistakes fixing people for saving the world, and whose accurate model of the machine licenses an inhuman program for the parts. The Architect appears to have believed, sincerely, that he was doing the necessary thing. That is the part his former students find hardest — not that the map was a con, but that it was largely correct, drawn by a man who could see the whole civilization and not the woman in front of him.
This piece touches on coercion and abuse. Support from a licensed professional or a trusted person is the right first step if you need it.